Re: Medscape boycotting podiatrists? Maybe not...
Quote:
You probably read the same blog notes recently that I did from fellow podiatrists, complaining that their Medscape accounts had been deleted based on the fact that they are DPMs. My account has been unaffected so far and I admit that I am glad because I learn so much from its contents.
Interestingly, I was reading an article on the Medscape website today when I ran across an article titled “Foot and Ankle Surgery Considerations for the Geriatric Patient.” Naturally I was eager to read it. I was surprised, however, to see that it was written by two of our colleagues – Daniel K. Lee and Gerit D. Mulder, both DPMs.
The article on Medscape originally came from the American Board of Family Medicine.
It doesn’t really make sense that they would be limiting access by DPMs and then allowing articles written by them, does it? There must be some misunderstanding. At least I hope so.
I can't imagine that medscape would do something so foolish. It essentially costs them nothing to continue to allow DPMs access to their website; prohibiting us would only create a PR problem and achieve no definable goal. Sometimes I worry that we, as DPMs, go around with a big chip our our collective "shoulders" and consequently are too quick to assume that we're being segregated against at any sign of trouble....
What i have heard of is that occasionally medscape will delete accounts that have not been active in a certain length of time --this is to conserve server space. Perhaps that is the root of all of this?